From owner-freebsd-chat Sun Dec 29 09:44:32 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id JAA06303 for chat-outgoing; Sun, 29 Dec 1996 09:44:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from albert.gnu.ai.mit.edu (albert.gnu.ai.mit.edu [128.52.46.31]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id JAA06297 for ; Sun, 29 Dec 1996 09:44:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from hill.gnu.ai.mit.edu by albert.gnu.ai.mit.edu (8.6.12/8.6.12GNU) with ESMTP id MAA27340; Sun, 29 Dec 1996 12:45:47 -0500 Received: by hill.gnu.ai.mit.edu (8.6.12/4.0) id ; Sun, 29 Dec 1996 12:43:05 -0500 Date: Sun, 29 Dec 1996 12:43:05 -0500 Message-Id: <199612291743.MAA00309@hill.gnu.ai.mit.edu> To: francisco@natserv.com CC: chat@freebsd.org In-reply-to: <199612290152.UAA28924@revelstone.jvm.com> (francisco@natserv.com) Subject: Re: Comments on using C++ instead of C From: Joel Ray Holveck Reply-to: joelh@gnu.ai.mit.edu Sender: owner-chat@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Does the compiler that comes with FreeBSD do C++? I tried compiling a > trivial C++ program using gcc and it failed. Must one send a parameter > to gcc to tell it the code is C++? Where and how did it fail? gcc does C++, but its C++ varies slightly from AT&T cfront or Borland and Microsloth's compilers. -- http://www.wp.com/piquan --- Joel Ray Holveck --- joelh@gnu.ai.mit.edu All my opinions are my own, not the FSF's, my employer's, or my dog's. Fourth law of computing: Anything that can go wro .signature: segmentation violation -- core dumped