From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 26 09:48:04 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C54416A4CE for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 09:48:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail21.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail21.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.133.158]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A67CB43D2F for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 09:48:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from PeterJeremy@optushome.com.au) Received: from cirb503493.alcatel.com.au (c211-30-75-229.belrs2.nsw.optusnet.com.au [211.30.75.229]) j3Q9lxuR003143 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 26 Apr 2005 19:48:01 +1000 Received: from cirb503493.alcatel.com.au (localhost.alcatel.com.au [127.0.0.1])j3Q9lx7l025931; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 19:47:59 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from pjeremy@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au) Received: (from pjeremy@localhost)j3Q9lwLu025930; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 19:47:58 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from pjeremy) Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 19:47:58 +1000 From: Peter Jeremy To: Avleen Vig Message-ID: <20050426094758.GI12673@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> References: <20050412213328.GC1953@lava.net> <6.2.1.2.2.20050417185631.05349ee0@localhost> <200504180330.37184.danny@ricin.com> <20050426020924.GX29262@silverwraith.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050426020924.GX29262@silverwraith.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Will 5.4 be an "Extended Life" release? X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Security issues [members-only posting] List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 09:48:04 -0000 On Mon, 2005-Apr-25 19:09:24 -0700, Avleen Vig wrote: >On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 03:30:37AM +0200, Danny Pansters wrote: >> Let me just boldly insert that IMHO, if 6.X is going to become stable this >> autumn already that indeed 5.4 or maybe 5.5 at least one of those must be >> long-term-supported. I'm sure one of the two will, as one of the two will >> reflcet ultimately the walk-of-life of 5-STABLE, won't it? > >Why don't we just skip 6 and name it "FreeBSD X" or "FreeBSD 10" ? Why not just merge XFree86 (or X.org) into 4.11 and release it as "FreeDeskTop 12"? -- Peter Jeremy