Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 3 Apr 2021 14:48:37 +0100
From:      Arthur Chance <freebsd@qeng-ho.org>
To:        Andrea Venturoli <ml@netfence.it>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: OpenZFS from ports
Message-ID:  <74e71e6c-67e0-4195-88ef-6053d0bd1750@qeng-ho.org>
In-Reply-To: <cd86bc07-b960-094b-5bc8-19739206ed8b@netfence.it>
References:  <cd86bc07-b960-094b-5bc8-19739206ed8b@netfence.it>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On 03/04/2021 10:10, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
> Hello.
> 
> In the next few days I'm going to convert a 11.4 system from UFS +
> UFS/GELI to ZFS.
> In the past I would have created two sets of partitions, one for a zpool
> and one for a zpool/GELI.
> Of course this would be a limitation since the partition sizes are fixed
> forever.
> 
> I hear OpenZFS has native encryption, but I'm not prepared to move to 13
> yet, so I'm evaulating upgrading to 12.2 and using OpenZFS from ports.
> Is this possible? Stable? Discouraged?
> Anything to watch for?
> Any disadvantage over GELI?
> 
> 
> 
> My (not definitive) plan would be:
> _ move everything to ZFS first (this would be to a new set of HDs, so I
> could keep the old ones as backup), losing encryption;
> _ upgrade to 12.2;
> _ switch to OpenZFS;
> _ create a new encrypted dataset and move there the data that should be
> encrypted.
> 
> Any better hint?

How about ZFS on top of GELI encrypted disks?

> I know kernel modules should be built locally, but I normally build with
> poudriere and never had any trouble.
> Would this work for sysutils/openzfs-kmod?


-- 
The number of people predicting the demise of Moore's Law doubles
every 18 months.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?74e71e6c-67e0-4195-88ef-6053d0bd1750>