From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Aug 23 21:14: 4 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mail.xmission.com (mail.xmission.com [198.60.22.22]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8826714D4B for ; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 21:14:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wes@softweyr.com) Received: from [204.68.178.39] (helo=softweyr.com) by mail.xmission.com with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 11J7yB-0005pG-00; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 22:14:00 -0600 Message-ID: <37C21C08.93833456@softweyr.com> Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 22:14:00 -0600 From: Wes Peters Organization: Softweyr LLC X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 3.1-RELEASE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: wayne@crb-web.com Cc: FreeBSD Hackers List Subject: Re: network performance vs. linux on small transfers References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Wayne Cuddy wrote: > > I am involved in a messaging system at work in which we need to send/receive > large amounts of small (one line messages) SMTP messages. We are currently using Sendmail 8.9.3 > on HPUX. > > Our application sends messages down a FIFO to a daemon process that is reading from > the FIFO. This process then connects to port 25 of the destination system and > delivers the mail via SMTP. Currently the destination system is the local > system so everything is done on one machine. > > Using HPUX we typically pass 5 messages a second. This system is a dual > 180Mhz K class server so this is surprisingly low performance for this system. > > When testing on FreeBSD 3.1 we also got 5 messages a second. This system is a > 500Mhz P3, this is also unacceptable performance. > > When we tested with Linux (kernel 2.2.5) we passed 15 messages a second > consistently using the exact same P3 described above. > > Since the HPUX and FreeBSD numbers are so close I am wondering there is some > performance tuning that I do not know about. Do you think the number might > change if multiple hosts were used? > > The daemon that reads from the FIFO makes only one connection to the local > Sendmail to deliver multiple messages in sequence. Why not just fork and exec sendmail instead? -- "Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?" Wes Peters Softweyr LLC http://softweyr.com/ wes@softweyr.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message