From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Oct 25 17:27:41 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9EAA16A47C
	for <freebsd-geom@freebsd.org>; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 17:27:41 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from pjd@garage.freebsd.pl)
Received: from mail.garage.freebsd.pl (arm132.internetdsl.tpnet.pl
	[83.17.198.132])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B03E43D6A
	for <freebsd-geom@freebsd.org>; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 17:27:38 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from pjd@garage.freebsd.pl)
Received: by mail.garage.freebsd.pl (Postfix, from userid 65534)
	id D6F4B45B26; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 19:27:36 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (dkz2.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl [83.24.29.2])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mail.garage.freebsd.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A8A045696;
	Wed, 25 Oct 2006 19:27:31 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 19:27:08 +0200
From: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org>
To: Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr>
Message-ID: <20061025172707.GA3005@garage.freebsd.pl>
References: <20061024152308.GG75746@garage.freebsd.pl>
	<ehlfjn$hbi$1@sea.gmane.org> <200610242150.54923.antik@bsd.ee>
	<20061025143446.GE1167@garage.freebsd.pl>
	<eho3ng$7gj$1@sea.gmane.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <eho3ng$7gj$1@sea.gmane.org>
X-PGP-Key-URL: http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/pjd.asc
X-OS: FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT i386
User-Agent: mutt-ng/devel-r804 (FreeBSD)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on 
	mail.garage.freebsd.pl
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL,
	RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL autolearn=no version=3.0.4
Cc: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Updated gjournal patches [20061024].
X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations
	<freebsd-geom.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-geom>,
	<mailto:freebsd-geom-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-geom>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-geom@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-geom-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-geom>,
	<mailto:freebsd-geom-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 17:27:41 -0000


--YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 06:35:03PM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
> Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 09:50:54PM +0300, Andrei Kolu wrote:
>=20
> >> Now I can mount it but only as journaled one.... Can I benefit from jo=
urnaling=20
> >> with other filesystems other than UFS2 right now?
> >=20
> > No.
>=20
> Hmmm. Isn't it more of the case that you CAN benefit from journaling as
> long as the file system is simple enough (like msdosfs) or you're using
> it just for the performance and don't mind the fscks (like ext2)?
>=20
> I.e. it's still a generic journaling layer with UFS as a special
> marginal case, right?

That's right. There can be performance benefits, but one has to verify
this in specific workload.

--=20
Pawel Jakub Dawidek                       http://www.wheel.pl
pjd@FreeBSD.org                           http://www.FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD committer                         Am I Evil? Yes, I Am!

--YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFFP55rForvXbEpPzQRApGhAJ9GLUgYMSammcm8+IldTHXUMECB+gCgsiCo
hsZScRM5L7N9P7rPf77DUU8=
=48Li
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4--