From owner-freebsd-proliant@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Sep 26 07:45:25 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-proliant@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-proliant@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-proliant@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC61C16A407
	for <freebsd-proliant@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 26 Sep 2006 07:45:25 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from peo@intersonic.se)
Received: from neonpark.inter-sonic.com (neonpark.inter-sonic.com
	[212.247.8.98]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 914D943D49
	for <freebsd-proliant@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 26 Sep 2006 07:45:25 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from peo@intersonic.se)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at inter-sonic.com
Message-ID: <4518DA92.4040007@intersonic.se>
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 09:45:22 +0200
From: Per olof Ljungmark <peo@intersonic.se>
Organization: Intersonic AB
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: kama <kama@pvp.se>
References: <4517C9AE.6000107@intersonic.se>
	<20060925132626.GG26539@voodoo.schug.net>
	<4517DCE3.2090206@intersonic.se>
	<20060925174144.R39281@ns1.as.pvp.se>
In-Reply-To: <20060925174144.R39281@ns1.as.pvp.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-proliant@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: DL380G2 instability
X-BeenThere: freebsd-proliant@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Technical discussion of FreeBSD on HP ProLiant server platforms."
	<freebsd-proliant.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-proliant>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-proliant-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-proliant>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-proliant@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-proliant-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-proliant>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-proliant-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 07:45:26 -0000

kama wrote:
<snip>>
> If you get a solid 5-STABLE and the 6-STABLE is still a problem, it will
> be one more than me (that I know of) that have encounter problems. As my
> boxes are in production, I cannot switch to 6-STABLE just to test things.
> So if you are able to do all the steps that needs to be done and post a
> problem report, it would be great, from my point of view. And then I can
> only hope that it is the same issue.
> 
> /Bjorn

Awright, I'm installing 5-STABLE now to see what gives. Discovered 
another interesting thing, diskinfo -tv gave me much better figures 
under 5.4 than 6-STABLE, don't know how reliable those figures are but 
it's worrying anyway. Will come back when I have enough info on running 5.