From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Feb 18 10:18: 9 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from rwcrmhc51.attbi.com (rwcrmhc51.attbi.com [204.127.198.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB4ED37B417 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2002 10:17:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from blossom.cjclark.org ([12.234.91.48]) by rwcrmhc51.attbi.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP id <20020218181758.YXYO2626.rwcrmhc51.attbi.com@blossom.cjclark.org>; Mon, 18 Feb 2002 18:17:58 +0000 Received: (from cjc@localhost) by blossom.cjclark.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g1IIHwT36436; Mon, 18 Feb 2002 10:17:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cjc) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 10:17:58 -0800 From: "Crist J. Clark" To: Luigi Rizzo Cc: "Michael R. Wayne" , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Odd ipfw behaviour Message-ID: <20020218101758.L48401@blossom.cjclark.org> Reply-To: cjclark@alum.mit.edu References: <200202152309.SAA00831@manor.msen.com> <20020216004721.B36782@blossom.cjclark.org> <20020218034112.D96593@staff.msen.com> <20020218054946.W48401@blossom.cjclark.org> <20020218120117.E96593@staff.msen.com> <20020218093113.H48401@blossom.cjclark.org> <20020218093852.B20152@iguana.icir.org> <20020218100458.K48401@blossom.cjclark.org> <20020218100928.D20152@iguana.icir.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20020218100928.D20152@iguana.icir.org>; from rizzo@icir.org on Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 10:09:28AM -0800 X-URL: http://people.freebsd.org/~cjc/ Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 10:09:28AM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 10:04:58AM -0800, Crist J. Clark wrote: > > > > Do these patches help? > > > > > > can you please summarise the problem and what the fix is trying to > > > achieve ? > > > > I don't really understand what the problem might be, and the issue is > > Precisely for this reason, what is that your patch is actually > trying to fix/achieve ? Without a goal, how can even test that > your code does what it supposed to do! I was trusting what the commit log said, ---------------------------- revision 1.187 date: 2001/12/28 21:21:57; author: julian; state: Exp; lines: +13 -5 Fix ipfw fwd so that it acts as the docs say when forwarding an incoming packet to another machine. Obtained from: Vicor Production tree MFC after: 3 weeks ---------------------------- -- Crist J. Clark | cjclark@alum.mit.edu | cjclark@jhu.edu http://people.freebsd.org/~cjc/ | cjc@freebsd.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message