Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 06:45:48 -0600 From: Jamie Gritton <jamie@FreeBSD.org> To: Dewayne Geraghty <dewayne.geraghty@heuristicsystems.com.au> Cc: 'Harald Schmalzbauer' <h.schmalzbauer@omnilan.de>, freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org, 'Miroslav Lachman' <000.fbsd@quip.cz> Subject: Re: new jail(8) ignoring devfs_ruleset? Message-ID: <518CEBFC.1010408@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <3AF9A67BBCE34917A8C9BC2863F7C0A5@as.lan> References: <511E61F5.1000805@omnilan.de> <511EC759.4060704@FreeBSD.org> <5121EC52.5040502@omnilan.de> <20130219212430.GA92116@felucia.tataz.chchile.org> <514B9EF6.3000607@quip.cz> <514BA14F.3090609@FreeBSD.org> <514BA3D9.5010901@quip.cz> <514BAA01.20402@FreeBSD.org> <20130509091738.GC4437@caravan.chchile.org> <518BA433.6050605@FreeBSD.org> <3AF9A67BBCE34917A8C9BC2863F7C0A5@as.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 05/09/13 22:42, Dewayne Geraghty wrote: > An ugly workaround to complete the jail closure, when relying on jail.conf, is to: > > jail -r $JAILNAME > umount /$LOCATION_OF_JAILS/$JAILNAME/dev || true The only problem with devfs I'm aware of is it not catching the right ruleset when starting in the rc system. So does this mean you're having problems unmounting /dev? What happens when you add a "-v" to the "jail -r"? It should note that /dev is being umounted. - Jamie
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?518CEBFC.1010408>