From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 23 15:02:53 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 281D316A46C for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2007 15:02:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scf@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.farley.org (farley.org [67.64.95.201]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9D8913C483 for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2007 15:02:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scf@FreeBSD.org) Received: from thor.farley.org (thor.farley.org [192.168.1.5]) by mail.farley.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l6NEPj2v073256; Mon, 23 Jul 2007 09:25:45 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from scf@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 09:25:45 -0500 (CDT) From: "Sean C. Farley" To: John Nielsen In-Reply-To: <200707221126.57742.lists@jnielsen.net> Message-ID: <20070723092248.J9030@thor.farley.org> References: <20070722061625.GD4336@soaustin.net> <46A336F6.6040103@jp.FreeBSD.org> <200707221126.57742.lists@jnielsen.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.1 (2007-05-02) on mail.farley.org Cc: Makoto Matsushita , Mark Linimon , freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: are the vmware3* ports still needed? X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 15:02:53 -0000 On Sun, 22 Jul 2007, John Nielsen wrote: *snip* > Anyway, I think that the emulators/vmware3 port should remain at least > until a usable replacement appears. If there _is_ a compelling > argument to axe it, a heads-up should probably go to a wider audience > than -emulation, possibly including one or more of -ports, -questions > and -stable. I saw this changeset[1] for VirtualBox recently. It offers a little hope for another alternative. Obviously, it is not complete, yet the UI supposedly builds already on FreeBSD. Sean 1. http://www.virtualbox.org/changeset/3680 -- scf@FreeBSD.org