Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 16 Jul 2015 23:27:25 +0000 (UTC)
From:      Warren Block <wblock@FreeBSD.org>
To:        doc-committers@freebsd.org, svn-doc-all@freebsd.org, svn-doc-head@freebsd.org
Subject:   svn commit: r46999 - head/en_US.ISO8859-1/htdocs/news/status
Message-ID:  <201507162327.t6GNRPJk042261@repo.freebsd.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Author: wblock
Date: Thu Jul 16 23:27:24 2015
New Revision: 46999
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/doc/46999

Log:
  Update the Core report based on feedback.

Modified:
  head/en_US.ISO8859-1/htdocs/news/status/report-2015-04-2015-06.xml

Modified: head/en_US.ISO8859-1/htdocs/news/status/report-2015-04-2015-06.xml
==============================================================================
--- head/en_US.ISO8859-1/htdocs/news/status/report-2015-04-2015-06.xml	Thu Jul 16 20:08:27 2015	(r46998)
+++ head/en_US.ISO8859-1/htdocs/news/status/report-2015-04-2015-06.xml	Thu Jul 16 23:27:24 2015	(r46999)
@@ -906,18 +906,14 @@
 	fairly radical ideas under discussion about how to improve the
 	project's responsiveness to security issues.</p>
 
-      <p>Shortly after BSDCan in mid-June, Warner Losh proposed a
-	change to <tt>style(9)</tt> which resulted in some lively
-	discussion.  An informal poll was conducted via Phabricator
-	and the change was committed within a couple of days.
-	Unfortunately, this did not meet with universal approval and
-	Core was called upon to arbitrate.  Warner backed out the
-	change, recognizing that there had not been enough time
-	allowed for proper discussion.  Many people were still in
-	transit from BSDCan, and the voting arrangements did not suit
-	everyone.  A new poll has since been held, with votes either
-	by e-mail or the Slowvote facility of Phabricator.  This
-	resulted in approval of the change by a wide margin.</p>
+      <p>In mid-June, a change to <tt>style(9)</tt> was proposed, and
+	resulted in much lively discussion.  Warner Losh conducted an
+	informal poll with Phabricator and the change was approved and
+	committed within a couple of days.  Unfortunately, complaints
+	were raised about the timing and voting methods and Core was
+	called upon to arbitrate.  The change was backed out
+	voluntarily, a new poll was held with more time to vote, and
+	the change was approved.</p>
 
       <p>During this period we had two new commit bits awarded, and
 	one taken in for safekeeping.  Welcome aboard to Chris Torek



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201507162327.t6GNRPJk042261>