From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 10 18:47:00 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C56D516A4CE; Sat, 10 Jul 2004 18:47:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9266843D1D; Sat, 10 Jul 2004 18:47:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from [192.160.235.2] (cs242743-143.austin.rr.com [24.27.43.143]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 286C7148BF; Sat, 10 Jul 2004 13:47:00 -0500 (CDT) From: Mark Linimon Organization: Lonesome Dove Computing Services To: Joe Marcus Clarke Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 13:44:16 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <200407101616.i6AGGX4x030909@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040710163118.GG58303@toxic.magnesium.net> <1089480171.98927.1.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> In-Reply-To: <1089480171.98927.1.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200407101344.16711.linimon@lonesome.com> cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org cc: Adam Weinberger cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/www/http_load Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 18:47:00 -0000 > I like linimon's PR idea better. Though we might consider this as a > stop-gap measure until linimon's patch can be tested on pointyhat. On the one hand, I'd say that this is pretty low-risk for requiring a full pointyhat run (after all, the lines merely move, not change), but on the other hand this will only affect ports that do not set MAINTAINER and that's pretty much an edge case, so maybe we do not lose much by waiting. (I have already fixed the one Makefile that triggered this bug). The patch to bsd.gnome.mk sounds more likely to produce a regression (for users of older systems). What I _don't_ yet understand is how this bug went untriggered for so long. mcl