From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 13 16:31:04 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E49416A417 for ; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:31:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com) Received: from schitzo.solgatos.com (pool-72-90-115-244.ptldor.fios.verizon.net [72.90.115.244]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 012F513C447 for ; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:31:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com) Received: from schitzo.solgatos.com (localhost.home.localnet [127.0.0.1]) by schitzo.solgatos.com (8.14.1/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m1DGV3Ir013945 for ; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 08:31:03 -0800 Received: from sopwith.solgatos.com (uucp@localhost) by schitzo.solgatos.com (8.14.1/8.13.4/Submit) with UUCP id m1DGV39e013942 for freebsd-performance@freebsd.org; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 08:31:03 -0800 Received: from localhost by sopwith.solgatos.com (8.8.8/6.24) id QAA06470; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:29:51 GMT Message-Id: <200802131629.QAA06470@sopwith.solgatos.com> To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 13 Feb 2008 09:46:05 CST." <20080213154605.GA96732@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 08:29:51 +0000 From: Dieter Subject: Re: Performance Tracker project update X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:31:04 -0000 > As suggested in other posts, deleting .pyo and .pyc files gets me down to > 6MB. Static libraries (.a files) in /usr/lib and /usr/local/lib still have > mismatching MD5 sums even though no source code change warrants this. Can > I do anything about that? Perhaps they have an embedded timestamp or version number? > Are static libraries even needed anymore? Are you going to be compiling anything? Has anyone compared performance of static vs dynamic linking lately? IIRC dynamic linking has a runtime performance hit which may or may not be significant depending on what you're doing.