Date: Tue, 20 Apr 1999 06:37:24 +0200 (MET DST) From: Andreas Gaertner <gax43544@icn.siemens.de> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> Cc: Gary Jennejohn <garyj@muc.de>, hm@hcs.de, andreas.gaertner.gp@icn.siemens.de, freebsd-isdn@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 3.1 and 0.70 Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.96.990420063518.10760R-100000@koerk> In-Reply-To: <20290.924556138@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 19 Apr 1999, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> I belive I may have introduced this in if_spppsubr.c with a leak from
> my hot-cell test lab here. It is belived to be harmless.
i see - but how come the code from 0.70 used in 2.2.7 differs from the one
used in 3.1?
regards and thanks again,
anderl
Andreas Gaertner, UNIX Systemadministration ICN CN23 [Fa. CLASS]
andreas.gaertner.gp@icn.siemens.de
http://www.kirk.muc.de
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-isdn" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.3.96.990420063518.10760R-100000>