From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 25 15:42:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B6EC106566B for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 15:42:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kwm@freebsd.org) Received: from viefep12-int.chello.at (viefep12-int.chello.at [62.179.121.32]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D63E8FC1E for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 15:42:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from edge04.upcmail.net ([192.168.13.239]) by viefep12-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.8.01.02.00 201-2260-120-20100118) with ESMTP id <20100225154255.YOQV17988.viefep12-int.chello.at@edge04.upcmail.net>; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:42:55 +0100 Received: from [192.168.0.105] ([80.56.73.45]) by edge04.upcmail.net with edge id mFit1d08r0ydU7k04FivWS; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:42:55 +0100 X-SourceIP: 80.56.73.45 From: Koop Mast To: "varga.michal@gmail.com" In-Reply-To: <3f1fd1ea1002250713v29671732i57d89ad0f666d1b@mail.gmail.com> References: <3f1fd1ea1002250318o582bbd5ua5a695e3af5e3cb9@mail.gmail.com> <4B867F67.50409@freebsd.org> <3f1fd1ea1002250713v29671732i57d89ad0f666d1b@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:43:55 +0100 Message-ID: <1267112635.4439.27.camel@headache.rainbow-runner.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.2 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=Vh4IX28iDtTVoW18VkC6EBRqewz3Au9nK9Op3VYRjtw= c=1 sm=0 a=GBmzoHRKrD8A:10 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=wu_GAiJyekq4qUNg9cIA:9 a=MmbZ6x5MQ3AkZd1b-b4A:7 a=QMu0xUeHTHy2GY-ce6Otg8Cq-M0A:4 a=MSl-tDqOz04A:10 a=SV7veod9ZcQA:10 a=HpAAvcLHHh0Zw7uRqdWCyQ==:117 Cc: gnome@freebsd.org, Joe Marcus Clarke Subject: Re: marcuscom and www/epiphany-extensions X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 15:42:58 -0000 On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 16:13 +0100, varga.michal@gmail.com wrote: > On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > On 2/25/10 6:18 AM, varga.michal@gmail.com wrote: > >> Hello guys, > >> > >> it's been quite some months into the 2.29 development cycle, and there > >> is still no www/epiphany-extensions on marcuscom to be seen. Is there > >> something wrong that prevents it from being ported, or it's just an > >> oversight / lack of manpower? (In that case, I could do it.) > > > > As far as I know, it's an oversight. I didn't notice an update. kwm, > > avl, or ahze may have tried to build it, and ran into problems, but I > > was not made aware. If you want to do the port, that would be great. > > > > Well, while generating temporary plist, I noticed that > epiphany-extensions actually doesn't honor PREFIX, probably because of > this line in configure: > > EPIPHANY_EXTENSIONS_DIR="$($PKG_CONFIG --variable=extensionsdir > epiphany-$_epiphany_api_version)" > > ..which obviously points to: > > > pkg-config --variable=extensionsdir epiphany-2.29 > /usr/local/lib/epiphany/2.29/extensions > > ..where libraries get installed, no matter of PREFIX. Also from the > quick glance it seems to me that the same issue is present in the > current 2.28.x port, which strikes me odd as I was under impression > that tinderbox runs tend to catch those. > > Anyway - what is the correct way to solve this, or possibly - am I > missing something in the big picture? > > m. Tinderbox will not catch this, because it uses the same prefix for epiphany and epiphany-extensions. About the lack of updates to this port, marcus is correct. It just fell though the cracks. Now that is known we missed a port, one of us will fix that soonish. Or do you want to do the work? -Koop