From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 22 21:40:46 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1B65806 for ; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 21:40:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 896D636F2 for ; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 21:40:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s7MLekbJ034639 for ; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 21:40:46 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 192878] comms/pr [maintainer] new source location Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 21:40:46 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports Tree X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: portmaster@bsdforge.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 21:40:46 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192878 --- Comment #30 from C Hutchinson --- (In reply to John Marino from comment #29) > There are over 50 PRs in the queue, even if I moved this to patch-ready, > nothing would happen for a while, so 1-2 days delay isn't going to make much > of a difference and I'd sure feel better with a "pouriere testport" log. Yea. Sure. I guess. Why not. Speaking of test logs. I don't suppose the foundation has enough hardware on hand to rig up a couple more Pointy Hats. That the ports tree could be run against. Sure the users provide feedback, and all. But I've got ~24 ports in my own queue, and given what I'm having to do, in order to even get them close to "stable". Let's me know that there's a lot of room for improvement. It'd be kind of like RedPorts is now. It'd send failure reports to the maintainer. Much the same as PointHat does with Base builds. Seems a valuable resource. Both to the maintainers, and it's users. But even more so to FreeBSD itself. Because of the reputation it would get, not only for the quality of it's OS, but for the ports it provides, as well. Wish I had more hardware on hand. I'd do it myself. Well. Off to build that shiny new 11 dev box. :) Thanks for all your time, and help, John. Have a great weekend. --Chris -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.