From owner-freebsd-current Mon May 10 13:51:23 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from helios.dnttm.ru (dnttm-gw.rssi.ru [193.232.0.205]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8031614FBA; Mon, 10 May 1999 13:51:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dima@tejblum.dnttm.rssi.ru) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by helios.dnttm.ru (8.9.1/8.9.1/IP-3) with UUCP id AAA14397; Tue, 11 May 1999 00:47:55 +0400 Received: from tejblum.dnttm.rssi.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tejblum.dnttm.rssi.ru (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id AAA05565; Tue, 11 May 1999 00:50:46 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from dima@tejblum.dnttm.rssi.ru) Message-Id: <199905102050.AAA05565@tejblum.dnttm.rssi.ru> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0gamma 1/27/96 To: "Jonathan M. Bresler" , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SPAM In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 10 May 1999 16:27:45 EDT." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 11 May 1999 00:50:45 +0400 From: Dmitrij Tejblum Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > "Jonathan M. Bresler" wrote: > > > with volunteers, we could moderate the list(s). mail transfer > > > would be slower as we wait for the moderator(s) to approve each piece > > > of email. if we use more than one moderator per list, the > > > time-sequence of email would be lost....we would get some very > > > strange threads...could be enteraining. > > > > Have you ever considered only allowing list members to post, or are > > there difficulties that make this impossible? I suggest following approach: moderate only mail that lack the mailing list name in To: or Cc: headers. It is far from ideal, but I think would work reasonably well. Dima To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message