From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 20 23:32:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B11CA1065670 for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 23:32:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from asmtpout029.mac.com (asmtpout029.mac.com [17.148.16.104]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FCD78FC0C for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 23:32:11 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Received: from cswiger1.apple.com ([17.209.4.71]) by asmtp029.mac.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.01 (built Dec 16 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0L9200H0XK1LKO80@asmtp029.mac.com> for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 16:32:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1004200000 definitions=main-1009200149 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.0.10011,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2010-09-20_14:2010-09-20, 2010-09-20, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 From: Chuck Swiger In-reply-to: <20100920231426.GA55891@energistic.com> Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 16:32:09 -0700 Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Message-id: <027D32F2-33EC-4EC5-B901-88191A63C7E1@mac.com> References: <201009201028.38559.david@vizion2000.net> <337EAE2CBCD84FF49F376860EF1830F6@eservoffice.com> <201009202229.01038.david@vizion2000.net> <20100920231426.GA55891@energistic.com> To: Steve Ames X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) Cc: freebsd-ports Ports Subject: Re: ptlib build failure - breaks pwlib - hence also asterisk - opal - & openh323 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 23:32:11 -0000 Hi, Steve-- On Sep 20, 2010, at 4:14 PM, Steve Ames wrote: >> PS Would you mind not top posting >=20 > Seriously? Top posting is somehow worse than scrolling to the bottom = of pages > of compile output to see a tiny response? Welcome to the 21st century. Welcome to the FreeBSD mailing lists. Please see: = http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/mailing-list-faq/etiquette.html#ETI= QUETTE-REPLYING "Please do not top post. By this, we mean that if you are replying to a = message, please put your replies after the text that you copy in your = reply. =95 A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. =95 Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?" Regards, --=20 -Chuck