From owner-freebsd-bugs Sun Aug 13 23:30:02 1995 Return-Path: bugs-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) id XAA02043 for bugs-outgoing; Sun, 13 Aug 1995 23:30:02 -0700 Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) id XAA02036 ; Sun, 13 Aug 1995 23:30:01 -0700 Date: Sun, 13 Aug 1995 23:30:01 -0700 Message-Id: <199508140630.XAA02036@freefall.FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-bugs Cc: From: J Wunsch Subject: Re: kern/682: to shot command name in Reply-To: J Wunsch Sender: bugs-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk The following reply was made to PR kern/682; it has been noted by GNATS. From: J Wunsch To: wosch@cs.tu-berlin.de Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/682: to shot command name in Date: Mon, 14 Aug 1995 08:18:54 +0200 (MET DST) As Wolfram Schneider wrote: > > /usr/include/sys/acct.h: > > #define AC_COMM_LEN 16 > struct acct { > char ac_comm[AC_COMM_LEN]; /* command name */ What incompatibilites will this produce? Is it just lastcomm(1) that has to be recompiled? -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)