From owner-freebsd-ports Sat Oct 25 04:40:04 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id EAA00116 for ports-outgoing; Sat, 25 Oct 1997 04:40:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id EAA29999; Sat, 25 Oct 1997 04:40:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 1997 04:40:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199710251140.EAA29999@hub.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports Cc: From: James Raynard Subject: Re: ports/4848: New Port to add! NASM Assembler Reply-To: James Raynard Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk The following reply was made to PR ports/4848; it has been noted by GNATS. From: James Raynard To: murray@cdrom.com Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/4848: New Port to add! NASM Assembler Date: Sat, 25 Oct 1997 12:22:17 +0100 On Fri, Oct 24, 1997 at 09:57:45PM -0700, murray@cdrom.com wrote: > > A port of the Netwide Assembler. Successfully installed and tested on > several FreeBSD 3.0, and 2.2-stable systems. This is my first port but > it was a very simple one and its a very useful/popular program. Please > send me email if anything in the Makefile should have been done differently, > since I plan on submitting a few more ports in the near future. See PR 4827. I can't look check Murray's port, as I don't have root access, but could someone commit it if it looks OK? Things to look for:- 1. User's choice of CFLAGS should be respected. 2. Handle the case where make encounters the -C flag, without resorting to GNU make. 3. All the documentation should be installed, as well as the nasm and ndisasm binaries. BTW What's the procedure for committers to submit ports? I use send-pr to submit mine, so that someone can test them out, but they seem to be completely ignored. Should I just commit them regardless? -- James Raynard, Edinburgh, Scotland. james@jraynard.demon.co.uk http://www.freebsd.org/~jraynard/