From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jun 25 08:10:05 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA909106566C
	for <freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 25 Jun 2012 08:10:05 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org
	[IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0B998FC17
	for <freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 25 Jun 2012 08:10:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5P8A5Pg005874
	for <freebsd-ports-bugs@freefall.freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 25 Jun 2012 08:10:05 GMT
	(envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q5P8A5Gq005873;
	Mon, 25 Jun 2012 08:10:05 GMT (envelope-from gnats)
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 08:10:05 GMT
Message-Id: <201206250810.q5P8A5Gq005873@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
From: Volodymyr Kostyrko <c.kworr@gmail.com>
Cc: 
Subject: Re: ports/168841: x11/slim fails to authorize (through kereros) if
 built without pam support
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Volodymyr Kostyrko <c.kworr@gmail.com>
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 08:10:06 -0000

The following reply was made to PR ports/168841; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Volodymyr Kostyrko <c.kworr@gmail.com>
To: Henry Hu <henry.hu.sh@gmail.com>
Cc: Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org>, bug-followup@freebsd.org, 
 Gleb Kurtsou <gleb.kurtsou@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: ports/168841: x11/slim fails to authorize (through kereros) if
 built without pam support
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 11:05:33 +0300

 Henry Hu wrote:
 >>> This patch enables PAM in slim.
 >>
 >> Given that we have a lot of users who don't like PAM, I'd much rather
 >> see this be optional. See for example x11/xscreensaver.
 >
 > Now PAM is optional. However, I still make it default to "on", since
 > PAM is part of the base system, and if we make it default to "off",
 > some people may be unable to login.  If people don't like it, they may
 > just turn it off.
 
 I'll second Doug here. The world can be built WITHOUT_PAM and the port 
 will fail. It's better to leave PAM support off by default as it is 
 really needed only in some custom setups like mine. FreeBSD doesn't 
 comes configured by default as Kerberos or LDAP member.
 
 -- 
 Sphinx of black quartz judge my vow.