From owner-freebsd-net  Fri Apr 28 17:52:18 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from luxren2.boostworks.com (luxren2.boostworks.com [194.167.81.214])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 9D8E737BA2A; Fri, 28 Apr 2000 17:52:12 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from root@boostworks.com)
Received: from boostworks.com (root@oldrn.luxdev.boostworks.com [192.168.1.99])
	by luxren2.boostworks.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id CAA55633;
	Sat, 29 Apr 2000 02:51:51 +0200 (CEST)
Message-Id: <200004290051.CAA55633@luxren2.boostworks.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2000 02:52:01 +0200 (CEST)
From: Remy Nonnenmacher <remy@boostworks.com>
Reply-To: remy@boostworks.com
Subject: Re: Proposal for ethernet, bridging, netgraph
To: rwatson@FreeBSD.ORG
Cc: archie@whistle.com, committers@FreeBSD.ORG,
	freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1000428143808.46934C-100000@fledge.watson.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

On 28 Apr, Robert Watson wrote:
> 
> Per my comment a little bit ago, please find patches that clean up the
> bridge/ipfw code a little at:
> 
> 	http://www.watson.org/~robert/bridge.patch
> 
> Because I'm travelling, I haven't had a chance to build or use the code in
>....

Nice try Robert, but the topic of the discussion haven't reached the
bridging code level. Next step.

RN.
ItM




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message