Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 13:03:54 +0200 From: Ollivier Robert <roberto@ns2.freenix.org> To: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> Cc: Matt Dillon <dillon@earth.backplane.com>, David O'Brien <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sbin/newfs newfs.8 newfs.c Message-ID: <20011015130353.B25715@ns2.freenix.org> In-Reply-To: <20011015041009.12A55380F@overcee.netplex.com.au>; from peter@wemm.org on Sun, Oct 14, 2001 at 09:10:05PM -0700 References: <200110150256.f9F2ur151690@earth.backplane.com> <20011015041009.12A55380F@overcee.netplex.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
According to Peter Wemm: > Personally, I'm worried about using 16k/2k on anything less than a large (say > larger than 1G) file system. Well, all my machines use 16k/2k for all filesystems now and I've never got any problem with that. It wastes a bit more space since fragments are now twice as big but that's about it. > If we made the defaults adjust to the fs size, I think that would be nice. > (ie: default to max -c possible, and switch to 16k/2k for "big" fs's) Like 8k/1k for <1GB and 16k/2k for >1GB ? Can be done I think. I'll have a look at that but bde has probably already written that patch years ago :-) -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- Eurocontrol EEC/ITM -=- Ollivier.Robert@eurocontrol.fr FreeBSD caerdonn.eurocontrol.fr 5.0-CURRENT #6: Thu Aug 10 17:36:11 CEST 2000 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011015130353.B25715>