From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Mar 19 18:06:04 1996 Return-Path: owner-isp Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id SAA20877 for isp-outgoing; Tue, 19 Mar 1996 18:06:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from solar.os.com (root@solar.os.com [199.232.136.65]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id SAA20872 for ; Tue, 19 Mar 1996 18:06:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from jupiter (jupiter.os.com [199.232.136.66]) by solar.os.com (8.7/8.7.0) with SMTP id VAA18547 for ; Tue, 19 Mar 1996 21:27:39 -0500 Message-Id: <199603200227.VAA18547@solar.os.com> X-Sender: craigs@solar X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Version 1.4.4 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Tue, 19 Mar 1996 21:03:16 -0500 To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org From: craigs@os.com (Craig Shrimpton) Subject: Re: ISDN: "modem" or board? (Was: Microsoft "Get ISDN"?) Sender: owner-isp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >>Well, I've been away from the list for a few days, and so much has >>come in that I don't think it would make sense to respond to each >>message individually, so here's a summary: >> >>1. Speed of a connection. Some people say "the bottleneck is the B >> channel, so you can use async instead". > >This is the funniest thing I've ever heard......LOL > I can't for the life of me figure out what he meant by that. Maybe it has something to do with running the B channel in voice mode and having the Bitsurfer refuse to switch to 64K on both channels. The comment is a complete non-sequiter! -Craig =================================================================== Orbit Internet Email: craigs@os.com 400 Grove Street Phone: (508) 753-8776 Worcester, MA 01605 http://www.os.com/