From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Mar 26 7:30:39 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mail.inka.de (quechua.inka.de [212.227.14.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A39A837B71B; Mon, 26 Mar 2001 07:30:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from naddy@mips.inka.de) Received: from kemoauc.mips.inka.de (uucp@) by mail.inka.de with local-bsmtp id 14hYx1-0002L0-00; Mon, 26 Mar 2001 17:30:35 +0200 Received: (from naddy@localhost) by kemoauc.mips.inka.de (8.11.3/8.11.1) id f2QEZGS41305; Mon, 26 Mar 2001 16:35:16 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from naddy) Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 16:35:16 +0200 (CEST) From: Christian Weisgerber Message-Id: <200103261435.f2QEZGS41305@kemoauc.mips.inka.de> To: jason_mann@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: Re: ports/26092: ksh93 port not installing properly X-Newsgroups: list.freebsd.ports In-Reply-To: <200103260936.f2Q9aJT47060@freefall.freebsd.org> Cc: gnats-admin@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, tg@FreeBSD.org Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In article <200103260936.f2Q9aJT47060@freefall.freebsd.org> you write: > >Number: 26092 > >Category: ports > >Synopsis: ksh93 port not installing properly > >Description: > When the ksh93 port is installed, it fails to add itself to /etc/shells. Also reported in PR 26091, see the fix there. > Aslo, the binary and man file are named ksh93 rather than ksh, although > I realise this is probably intentional. Yes, it is. shells/pdksh already installs as "ksh". Since people may want to install both shells in parallel (I do!), I had to choose a different name. We could change this and install pdksh as "pdksh" and ksh93 as "ksh". Feel free to discuss this with the maintainer of pdksh (tg@freebsd.org). I don't hold an opinion either way. -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.inka.de To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message