Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2012 10:17:03 -0400 From: Eitan Adler <eadler@freebsd.org> To: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Cc: svn-doc-head@freebsd.org, svn-doc-all@freebsd.org, doc-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r39701 - head/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/hubs Message-ID: <CAF6rxgm_NWoLK9XwbZxuJkzy7VwUrAeQ9D7R-i3S64HRX9ap=Q@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <alpine.GSO.1.10.1210081943540.22950@multics.mit.edu> References: <201210072033.q97KXKEF065990@svn.freebsd.org> <alpine.GSO.1.10.1210081943540.22950@multics.mit.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 8 October 2012 20:05, Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> wrote: > > The claim that rsync is a memory hog dates from its addition in 2002. > I do not believe (especially given modern hardware specs) that the claim is > still accurate, since modern versions of rsync have changed the algorithm > used so as to not suffer from this flaw. > > This change is just swapping wrong for differently wrong, and should be > revisited. This was intentional. I wanted to make these two changes in different commits. The section needs to be completely rewritten in light of the eventual loss of cvsup, and the non-acceptance of new mirrors. -- Eitan Adler Source & Ports committer X11, Bugbusting teams
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF6rxgm_NWoLK9XwbZxuJkzy7VwUrAeQ9D7R-i3S64HRX9ap=Q>