Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 13:28:30 -0500 (EST) From: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> To: Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Looking for static analysis tool to generate call graphs Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1040303132517.27227C-100000@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <xzpu116cnm6.fsf@dwp.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 3 Mar 2004, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> writes: > > Well, using a scary combination of grep, awk, a long list of "omit this" > > regexp's, and prcc from cflow, I got the following: > > > > http://www.watson.org/~robert/freebsd/20040302-sockets.ps > > > > Duck and cover. > > Hmm, is there any way you can try to group functions with similar names > together? For instance, functions whose names match /^fd.*/ call mostly > eachother, and the graph would be a lot cleaner if they were placed > close together. In the most recent revision, I've tried to assign the same rank and color to certain classes of functions: System Calls (accept, bind, close, connect, dup, ...) Protocol Switch (pru_accept, pru_attach, pru_bind, pr_ctloutput, ...) File Descriptor Switch (fo_read, fo_write, fo_poll, ...) Socket File Descriptor Functions (soo_read, soo_write, ...) In addition, I assigned the same color to certain classes of functions: Almost System Calls (kern_bind, kern_connect, accept1, ...) Protocol Upcalls to Socket Layer (soisdisconnected, soisdisconnected, ...) I'm going to experiment with grouping later today. Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects robert@fledge.watson.org Senior Research Scientist, McAfee Research
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.NEB.3.96L.1040303132517.27227C-100000>