Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 23:32:21 +0000 From: greg@unrelenting.technology To: "Mark Millard" <marklmi@yahoo.com>, "Dan Kotowski" <dan.kotowski@a9development.com> Cc: "Mark Murray" <mrvmurray@icloud.com>, freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Recommended arm hardware (mostly for compilation)? Message-ID: <ab2d4c6aeb971e4094739facf85afa16@unrelenting.technology> In-Reply-To: <59616D7C-7D72-4E11-B01D-68A42D756587@yahoo.com> References: <59616D7C-7D72-4E11-B01D-68A42D756587@yahoo.com> <1b109252-3232-05c4-e1e0-2fea4739583d@spth.de> <47A5AF8A-1EB9-4721-94D5-B0A0A6FFF69B@unrelenting.technology> <9E10C464-474F-489A-A667-B263A64E78F2@googlemail.com> <EXbrttrQC0_YXokurrTuHT6YcY3XC0JhXIkklq6vP6OmhlDw2DSXWz8B3_e_9kDFZowErA8gjjvQrAe4w5t4M8J1Fmfb-ev4uIgI9r7wW4w=@a9development.com> <f7a88252-fa01-69a1-d442-747d69541d89@spth.de> <C088F416-80FA-45E3-A61E-8E7EB61B94ED@yahoo.com> <39FF7B47-B807-4D70-BB45-FC324FD4B913@icloud.com> <D2D23CDB-B954-458B-B6C7-07F0719FF567@yahoo.com> <hX3wxjZYcivC4GAkihCo30BhLHAiEu_KSRmrixI6jNgEeKclJsYmU-TQU9d2CBxmIIpkQ60l-walBuWase5N8MpjjWnW7XaULWqajYFC3Hs=@a9development.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
May 19, 2020 2:01 AM, "Mark Millard via freebsd-arm" <freebsd-arm@freebsd= .org> wrote:=0A=0A> On 2020-May-18, at 05:27, Dan Kotowski <dan.kotowski = at a9development.com> wrote:=0A> =0A>> After a solid 16hrs this weekend, = I can confirm that the pre-built images do NOT "just work", at=0A>> least= not with SolidRun's HoneyComb version rev 1.4. A more thorough post in t= he other thread I=0A>> have about this platform with subject "FreeBSD on = Layerscape/QorIQ LX2160X".=0A> =0A> Interestingly, there seems to be anot= her github area from=0A> solidrun referenced by:=0A> =0A> https://develop= er.solid-run.com/knowledge-base/lx2160a-firmware=0A> =0A> that has a link= that points to:=0A> =0A> https://github.com/SolidRun/lx2160a_build/tree/= LSDK-19.09-sr-uefi=0A> =0A> Note that it is explicitly uefi . There also = is a non-uefi branch:=0A> =0A> https://github.com/SolidRun/lx2160a_build/= tree/LSDK-19.09-sr=0A> =0A> The referencing developer.solid-run page says= :=0A> =0A> Currently recommend are branch LSDK-19.09-sr for U-Boot, and b= ranch LSDK-19.09-sr-uefi for UEFI!=0A=0AThis is bad information! :) Outda= ted at least.=0A=0AI suppose LSDK-19.09-sr-uefi build scripts would use L= SDK-19.09-sr edk2-platforms:=0A=0Ahttps://github.com/SolidRun/edk2-platfo= rms/tree/LSDK-19.09-sr/Platform/NXP/LX2160aCex7Pkg/AcpiTables/Dsdt=0A=0AN= ow compare to master-lx2160a edk2-platforms (which I guess the very activ= ely updated master branch of the build scripts would use):=0A=0Ahttps://g= ithub.com/SolidRun/edk2-platforms/tree/master-lx2160a/Silicon/NXP/LX2160A= /AcpiTables/Dsdt=0A=0AOnly on master-lx2160a, XHCI (USB3) and AHCI (SATA)= have the generic compatibility IDs that would allow any OS to pick them = up.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ab2d4c6aeb971e4094739facf85afa16>