Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 10 Jan 2004 17:43:54 -0800
From:      Gary Kline <kline@thought.org>
To:        Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk>, Marty Landman <MLandman@face2interface.com>, FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>, Gary Kline <kline@thought.org>
Subject:   Re: perl script question.
Message-ID:  <20040111014354.GD44177@tao.thought.org>
In-Reply-To: <20040110233645.GA5668@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk>
References:  <20040110221036.GA44130@tao.thought.org> <20040110223308.GA4881@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> <20040110223907.GA16659@Uruk-Hai.Sanitarium.mine.nu> <20040110230218.GA5347@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> <6.0.0.22.0.20040110182450.0a09ce58@pop.face2interface.com> <20040110233645.GA5668@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 11:36:45PM +0000, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 06:26:30PM -0500, Marty Landman wrote:
> > At 06:02 PM 1/10/2004, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> > >On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 11:39:07PM +0100, Björn Andersson wrote:
> > >
> > >> If this occures more than once on a line we should have the line as this:
> > >>   perl -pi.bak -e 's/\s+\w+_\w+\.?//g;' filename
> > >
> > >Good point.  Also, if the stuff_separated_by_underscores wraps around
> > >onto more than one line, then there may not be any leading whitespace:
> > 
> > I don't see why the translate sol'tn that Gary Kline gave first isn't 
> > adequate.
> 
> Err --- Gary Kline was the OP asking how to do this: I think you mean 
> Bernard El-Hagin's solution?
> 
>     % perl -i.bak -pe 'tr/_/ /' <files>
> 
> That doesn't do the right thing.  It turns:
> 
>     "This is a sample ordinary sentence.  This_is_joined_up_with_underscores."
> 
> into:
> 
>     "This is a sample ordinary sentence.  This is joined up with underscores."
> 
> but the requirement is to produce:
> 
>     "This is a sample ordinary sentence."
> 

	Exactly so.  I could easily tr '_' to ' ', but not delete //g
	and entire string that contained undrscores.  BTW, this 
	kind of technique would be useful in filtering 
	^ Subject: lines like "get.a.bigger.bustline" or other such
	garbage.  --But then the people who hack the antispam 
	programs are do doubt expert at this... .

	gary




-- 
   Gary Kline     kline@thought.org   www.thought.org     Public service Unix



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040111014354.GD44177>