From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Dec 4 14:14:15 2000 From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 4 14:14:12 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mass.osd.bsdi.com (adsl-63-202-176-64.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.202.176.64]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B9EA37B402 for ; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 14:14:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from mass.osd.bsdi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mass.osd.bsdi.com (8.11.0/8.11.1) with ESMTP id eB4MMmF01570; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 14:22:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from msmith@mass.osd.bsdi.com) Message-Id: <200012042222.eB4MMmF01570@mass.osd.bsdi.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: Tom Cc: Noor Dawod , FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List Subject: Re: Xeon In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 04 Dec 2000 10:17:14 PST." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2000 14:22:48 -0800 From: Mike Smith Sender: msmith@mass.osd.bsdi.com Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Large SMP configurations (> 4 processors) could be an issue, but that > wouldn't be the fault of the Xeon support but an SMP issue. However, I > did see an e-mail early this year about someone booting FreeBSD on a 8 CPU > Xeon server. I booted 4.1 SMP on an 8-way ProFusion box. (8 x PIII/Xeon-700) It worked as expected. -- ... every activity meets with opposition, everyone who acts has his rivals and unfortunately opponents also. But not because people want to be opponents, rather because the tasks and relationships force people to take different points of view. [Dr. Fritz Todt] V I C T O R Y N O T V E N G E A N C E To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message