Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 14:47:05 -0600 From: "Jeremy Messenger" <mezz7@cox.net> To: "Luigi Rizzo" <rizzo@icir.org> Cc: multimedia@freebsd.org Subject: Re: speex upgrade to 1.1.12 ? Message-ID: <op.tn530rea9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> In-Reply-To: <20070222122648.A9443@xorpc.icir.org> References: <op.tn34fuds9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> <20070221112414.E91427@xorpc.icir.org> <op.tn372ibm9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> <op.tn4hkoua9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> <20070221160312.A94968@xorpc.icir.org> <op.tn5vkdeh9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> <20070222095543.A7555@xorpc.icir.org> <op.tn51nvp99aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> <20070222120126.A8925@xorpc.icir.org> <op.tn52vigl9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> <20070222122648.A9443@xorpc.icir.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 14:26:48 -0600, Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 02:22:20PM -0600, Jeremy Messenger wrote: >> On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 14:01:26 -0600, Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org> wrot= e: >> >> > On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 01:56:09PM -0600, Jeremy Messenger wrote: >> >> On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 11:55:43 -0600, Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org> = >> wrote: >> >> >> >> > On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 11:44:27AM -0600, Jeremy Messenger wrote= : >> > ... >> >> >> -CONFIGURE_TARGET -> USE_GNOME=3Dgnometarget >> >> >> -Add USE_GNOME=3Dltverhack to avoid shared library version bump= to >> >> often >> >> >> by >> >> >> fix libtool bug. >> >> >> >> FYI: The result is libspeex.so.1 now instead of libspeex.so.[3|5].= >> > >> > Just curious - now the library number (used to be 3) goes back to 1= , >> > so is there anything that expect version number not to go back ? >> >> I am a bit confuse with your question, so I am not sure if I answer >> correct to your question. It is expected to go back to 1, because it = is = >> a >> correct number. The speex in Linux has .so.1 too. There is a bug in > > well basically the question was that for good or bad, the previous > version of the library (speex.1.0.5) in FreeBSD was 3 > and now becomes something different even though the ABI has not > changed (hopefully; we know it is backward compatible, i have no > idea if it has more in it). We could hack it to make it stays 3 instead go with 5, but I figure that= = the ltverhack will giving us a good job in the long run than hack at the= = each times by ourselves. No more to figure out if it is backward = compatible or whatever. This decision will be made by the speex = developer(s). > On the other hand, if the linux version is .1 maybe some scripts and > makefiles look for .1 so it is more convenient to use the same > version number. Fair enough. Yeah, that's true. When the ltverhack was added, a lot of Mono ports don= 't = need many patches anymore. Many of mono apps use dlopen() on libraries. Cheers, Mezz > cheers > luigi -- = mezz7@cox.net - mezz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD GNOME Team - FreeBSD Multimedia Hat (ports, not src) http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org http://wiki.freebsd.org/multimedia - multimedia@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?op.tn530rea9aq2h7>