From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Nov 11 8:50:30 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from lcmail2.lc.ca.gov (lcmail2.lc.ca.gov [165.107.12.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2BE937B479 for ; Sat, 11 Nov 2000 08:50:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from CONVERSION-DAEMON by lcmail2.lc.ca.gov (PMDF V5.2-27 #40821) id <0G3V00F01DFG25@lcmail2.lc.ca.gov> for questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 11 Nov 2000 08:50:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from tagalong ([165.107.42.185]) by lcmail2.lc.ca.gov (PMDF V5.2-27 #40821) with SMTP id <0G3V00DH2DFGU1@lcmail2.lc.ca.gov> for questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 11 Nov 2000 08:50:04 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2000 08:50:23 -0800 From: Drew Tomlinson Subject: RE: What Is config> During Boot? In-reply-to: To: bbayorgeon@new.rr.com, 'Mike Meyer' Cc: questions@freebsd.org Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Importance: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-priority: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > -----Original Message----- > From: Rak [mailto:bbayorgeon@new.rr.com] > Sent: Friday, November 10, 2000 8:33 PM > To: Mike Meyer; Drew Tomlinson > Cc: questions@freebsd.org > Subject: RE: What Is config> During Boot? > > > > device ed0 at isa? port 0x240 irq 9 iomem 0xd8000 > > device ed1 at isa? port 0x260 irq 11 iomem 0xd8000 > > > This looks a little funny that both of these cards are trying > to use iomem 0xd8000 > > Now later you say: > > > ed0 at port 0x240-0x25f iomem 0xd8000 irq 9 drq 0 on isa0 > > ed0: address 00:40:05:66:b2:55, type NE2000 (16 bit) > > ed1 at port 0x260-0x27f iomem 0xd0000 irq 11 on isa0 > > ed1: address 00:40:05:66:b2:52, type NE2000 (16 bit) > > So how did ed1 go from iomem d8000 to d0000? Good eyes! As I said in step 5, based on someone else's thought that both using d8000 was a problem, I edited my kernel config file and recompiled. But because I wrote my plea for help after I completed all of the steps I described, dmesg output was not current for that step and I missed editing it. So in other words, it didn't change from d8000 to d0000. I chose d0000 as I assume this has something to do with address space like what you see in your BIOS setting for shadow availability. And as I recall, the space either started with 0000 or 8000. It was just a try. > This could be the cause of: > > > ed1: device timeout > > > > What is "config>" and should there be something there for ed1 > as well? Is > > this my problem? I'd appreciate any help, thoughts, nudges, > etc. I'm new > > to both Unix and FBSD so I may be missing something really > basic. > > No, you don't really need to config> ed1 if is set up in the > kernel config > file correctly and so compiled. > > > device ed1 at isa? port 0x260 irq 11 iomem 0xd8000 > > One problem is though, like I said both cards trying to use > the d8000 memory space. Change one of these to d0000 or > something. I did try that in step 5 but still could not communicate with the card. > the puzzling thing is why do you get this: > > > ed1 at port 0x260-0x27f iomem 0xd0000 irq 11 on isa0 > > Nothing seems to be telling it to use d0000 unless it is > adjusting this automagically?! No magic here. As I said above, it's because I told it to in step 5. Sorry for the confusion as I missed editing the output to reflect what was really reported. Thank you for taking the time to look this over. If you have any other ideas or suggestions, I'd be willing to try them. Drew To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message