From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 2 22:09:57 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E665416A41F for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2005 22:09:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: from bunrab.catwhisker.org (adsl-63-193-123-122.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.193.123.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 975D943D45 for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2005 22:09:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: from bunrab.catwhisker.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bunrab.catwhisker.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jA2M9scS051790 for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2005 14:09:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from david@bunrab.catwhisker.org) Received: (from david@localhost) by bunrab.catwhisker.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id jA2M9sCU051789 for stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 2 Nov 2005 14:09:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from david) Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 14:09:54 -0800 From: David Wolfskill To: stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20051102220954.GM69015@bunrab.catwhisker.org> Mail-Followup-To: David Wolfskill , stable@freebsd.org References: <075001c5dff5$e859fbc0$8adb7bd1@icarz.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <075001c5dff5$e859fbc0$8adb7bd1@icarz.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: Subject: Re: Fw: GENERIC and DEFAULTS X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2005 22:09:58 -0000 On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 04:39:30PM -0500, Ken Menzel wrote: > ... > If I include GENERIC can I comment out the following? > #cpu I486_CPU > #cpu I586_CPU Well, it's your (copy of) the file; I suppose you can do whatever you want to with it. :-) > Does this make any difference? I have always done this out of habit. I believe it will make some difference, yes. > would it become > > nocpu I486_CPU ? As of FreeeBSD 6.0-STABLE, /usr/src/usr.sbin/config/lang.l (rev. 1.41, last updated 2005/02/10 10:46:27) has tokens defined such as "cpu", "device", "nodevice", etc., but not "nocpu". It might be worth adding, though. Of course, some semantics would need to be associated with it in config.y. > Or is this irrelevant as the build knows what CPU I have? It might know what kind you havem but that's no guarantee that you plan to run the kernel you build on the same machine. Peace, david -- David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org Prediction is difficult, especially if it involves the future. -- Niels Bohr See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for public key.