From owner-freebsd-bugs Tue Mar 25 19:30:07 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id TAA10476 for bugs-outgoing; Tue, 25 Mar 1997 19:30:07 -0800 (PST) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id TAA10460; Tue, 25 Mar 1997 19:30:04 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 25 Mar 1997 19:30:04 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199703260330.TAA10460@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs Cc: From: Mike Pritchard Subject: Re: bin/2256 PPP doesn't close w/NT client Reply-To: Mike Pritchard Sender: owner-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk The following reply was made to PR bin/2256; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Mike Pritchard To: freebsd-gnats-submit Cc: Subject: Re: bin/2256 PPP doesn't close w/NT client Date: Tue, 25 Mar 1997 19:25:12 -0800 (PST) Feedback from the originator: Greg Bedrossian wrote: > > Hello Mike, > > Thank you for following up on this strange issue. > > The problem still persists. I have had to set up an NT server to > accommodate NT users who need to dial in. > > The version of FreeBSD I am using is 2.1.5. > > I have not tried a newer version as of yet. What is available? > > To add to my problems, the scripting tool within Win95 does not > negotiate a correct sequence when loging into our FreeBSD server to > get a ppp connection. It has to be stepped. I overcame this problem > by adding 1sec delays in between the commands. However, at > "endproc" it will hang there waiting for a response from the FreeBSD > host until you press continue in the dialogue box of the script's > login sequence. I am being told by subscribers that they don't seem > to have this problem using the same script with other ISPs. It > seems to me that pppd has a timing problem at the I/O side of it. > This could explain why it does not shutdown properly with NT clients > and now this other problem of loging in via a script! Though, I am > not sure of any of it. > > This is presenting a serious embarrassment for me as I am losing my > subscribers. Yet I just cannot see where the problem may be, as so > much of it works well, and there are no problems reported by NeXT > users. > > > Regards > > > kgb