From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 26 03:39:11 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57CC689C for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2013 03:39:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wlosh@bsdimp.com) Received: from mail-pd0-f172.google.com (mail-pd0-f172.google.com [209.85.192.172]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2BE5524DB for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2013 03:39:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pd0-f172.google.com with SMTP id z10so2926783pdj.3 for ; Sun, 25 Aug 2013 20:39:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-gm-message-state:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:message-id:cc:from:subject :date:to; bh=puXfa+b8hzyct6lO3fJxsl6NTtuzp1I5OxTmgHtZFXs=; b=pE6g9hCzkuzRvvSGgb3ZRF2IXyzJAz5XwJ8/7dYIqveTr3TxYm6jl+349N3qJ7LAVk NRXWqyJpM4m5TswvCc3zpKdWB8bFcSdcUjZDQ3bynOgUaSm1ldioT9e9E1CzDJWLLP0u OGQH9lFC7lFmjFee4KFtSO5bIxQnlhQkGa130q7332Ma29hWUnNkmAIqmTR0HCjqUPAI h4I/IJ9GpEngBa9w3E+cDeeOM8TyFpFMyWuPMUpwtwzALG/N4Bgc3+fxFMj8N5a9n2CF CphkGSou/lwh1FA2a5TIg0NIUnygcfHrDRUpuGKIYeZEmBTTvrdL2hjPpPQ49uJRWk6V t5MA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnvt8hQhUf9Ifg0vQCceJNi/HCuRtCqNkLTtE+LEFebvnQpKlC+9rqAQu+ijgwGxlaH/Cow X-Received: by 10.66.161.229 with SMTP id xv5mr12392650pab.87.1377488343870; Sun, 25 Aug 2013 20:39:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.0.122] (50-78-194-198-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net. [50.78.194.198]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id qp10sm16967023pab.13.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 25 Aug 2013 20:39:02 -0700 (PDT) References: <20130822200902.GG94127@funkthat.com> <105E26EE-8471-49D3-AB57-FBE2779CF8D0@FreeBSD.org> <521751AF.6040905@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-Id: X-Mailer: iPad Mail (9B206) From: Warner Losh Subject: Re: patch to add AES intrinsics to gcc Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 21:38:55 -0600 To: Gerald Pfeifer X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 11:01:56 +0000 Cc: "toolchain@freebsd.org" , Volodymyr Kostyrko , John-Mark Gurney , "current@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 03:39:11 -0000 Can all such ports be identified with a ports build run in a special chroot w= ithout FreeBSD's FCC installed? Sent from my iPad On Aug 25, 2013, at 7:41 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Fri, 23 Aug 2013, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote: >> I object. Many ports that compiles perfectly on gcc 4.2.1 can't be=20 >> compiled with lang/gcc. I checked this once and the number of ports=20 >> that require strictly gcc 4.2.1 was bigger for me then number of=20 >> ports that can't be compiled with clang but fill fine on lang/gcc. >>=20 >> I'll gonna recheck whether lang/gcc42 is sufficient for them. But I=20 >> have that bad feeling... >=20 > If there are ports that use USE_GCC=3Dany and do not build with > lang/gcc, these should have USE_GCC=3D4.2 -- without a '+'! -- > not USE_GCC=3Dany. >=20 > It'll be great if you can fix any such port. >=20 > Gerald > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-toolchain > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-toolchain-unsubscribe@freebsd.or= g"