From owner-freebsd-i386@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 6 16:40:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-i386@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-i386@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D1C516A4DD for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2006 16:40:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D020A43D49 for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2006 16:40:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k86GeLF2011842 for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2006 16:40:21 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k86GeLES011837; Wed, 6 Sep 2006 16:40:21 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 16:40:21 GMT Message-Id: <200609061640.k86GeLES011837@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-i386@FreeBSD.org From: "Bucky Jordan" Cc: Subject: RE: i386/100160: [mfid] Perc5i: additional symptomatic info on virtual disk detection issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-i386@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Bucky Jordan List-Id: I386-specific issues for FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2006 16:40:22 -0000 The following reply was made to PR i386/100160; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Bucky Jordan" To: "Jeffrey Williams" , Cc: , , Subject: RE: i386/100160: [mfid] Perc5i: additional symptomatic info on virtual disk detection issue Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 12:39:35 -0400 >In the meantime if anybody else is aware of another work around of fix=20 >for this, I appreciate hearing about it. =20 I've got almost the same setup- 6.1 amd64 RELEASE, a 2950 with 6 drives attached to the Perc5/I SAS Raid controller. Right now I've got the whole thing configured as a RAID5x6 disks and it seems to be working fine.=20 I was able to also create smaller RAID sets (for example, a 4 disk RAID10) without an issue, and I did not have to remove extra drives. Someone (on -hardware I think) mentioned that the problem recognizing multiple virtual volumes is addressed in 6-stable, but I have not had the chance to try it out. I will post the results if/when I do. - Bucky