From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Jun 8 2:36:57 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from guru.mired.org (okc-65-26-235-186.mmcable.com [65.26.235.186]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 05C0237B401 for ; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 02:36:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mwm@mired.org) Received: (qmail 72861 invoked by uid 100); 8 Jun 2001 09:36:49 -0000 From: Mike Meyer MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15136.40113.880621.617931@guru.mired.org> Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 04:36:49 -0500 To: Giorgos Keramidas Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: softupdates crash -> data recovery ? In-Reply-To: <74818000@toto.iv> X-Mailer: VM 6.90 under 21.1 (patch 14) "Cuyahoga Valley" XEmacs Lucid X-face: "5Mnwy%?j>IIV\)A=):rjWL~NB2aH[}Yq8Z=u~vJ`"(,&SiLvbbz2W`;h9L,Yg`+vb1>RG% *h+%X^n0EZd>TM8_IB;a8F?(Fb"lw'IgCoyM.[Lg#r\ Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Giorgos Keramidas types: > On Thu, 7 Jun 2001 scanner@jurai.net wrote: > > The complexity of softupdates limit's who has the ability to implement it > > for one. Most people using JFS' now are blind sheep followers. There are > > papers out there describgin why softupdates wins over JFS. > > Can I have a reference or two? Please? This is out of very sincere and honest > interest, and I will try to read them as objectively as possible, despite the > fact that I'm an avid FreeBSD user and softupdates is enabled in most of my > filesystems For information about soft updates in general, see . For journaling vs. soft updates, see http://www.mired.org/home/mwm/ Independent WWW/Perforce/FreeBSD/Unix consultant, email for more information. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message