From owner-freebsd-bugbusters@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 14 03:36:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugbusters@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BC5016A4CE for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 03:36:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from shaft.techsupport.co.uk (shaft.techsupport.co.uk [212.250.77.214]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AD9243D53 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 03:36:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from setantae@submonkey.net) Received: from cpc2-cdif3-6-0-cust204.cdif.cable.ntl.com ([81.103.67.204] helo=shrike.submonkey.net ident=mailnull) by shaft.techsupport.co.uk with esmtp (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.31; FreeBSD) id 1BDhlK-000F3P-6P for freebsd-bugbusters@freebsd.org; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 11:36:58 +0100 Received: from setantae by shrike.submonkey.net with local (Exim 4.31; FreeBSD) id 1BDhlH-0003zm-TZ for freebsd-bugbusters@freebsd.org; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 11:36:55 +0100 Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 11:36:55 +0100 From: Ceri Davies To: freebsd-bugbusters Message-ID: <20040414103655.GN465@submonkey.net> References: <20040414073119.GC1544@isis.wad.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="RXc6EO4W1yUvSQ0X" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040414073119.GC1544@isis.wad.cz> X-PGP: finger ceri@FreeBSD.org User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: Ceri Davies Subject: Re: per-user send-pr defaults: ~/.send-pr.rc? X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugbusters@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Coordination of the Problem Report handling effort. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 10:36:59 -0000 --RXc6EO4W1yUvSQ0X Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Apr 14, 2004 at 09:31:19AM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote: > I'm aware of the Ceri's testing of GNATS 4, but don't know how far that > got, hence the question instead of a pr with a patch. It's still ongoing; there's a project page (of sorts) at http://www.FreeBSD.org/projects/gnats4/ which gives details on where we're stalled at the moment (although I have remembered some updates that need making to the plan). > Would a patch for send-pr adding support for defaults handling using > an rc file be welcome? If so, should I target send-pr as is in our tree, > the one from the 4.0 tarball, or upstream cvs? I'd certainly be interested in looking at it. At the moment my plan to upgrade is entirely {hub,www,freefall}.FreeBSD.org based - there seems to be no pressing need to upgrade the distributed send-pr, so I'd target the in-tree send-pr. If it should turn out that a client-side upgrade is worth the effort then we can bring the patches forward (I had to do the same for our local edit-pr hacks). > I'm growing tired of fixing several fields in every pr I'm submitting, > and don't want to introduce local hacks to send-pr as I would surely > have to recreate them with every installworld on each of my boxes thanks > to my bad memory. Sounds like something that would be widely appreciated. Thanks, Ceri --=20 --RXc6EO4W1yUvSQ0X Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAfRRHocfcwTS3JF8RAvFwAJ0Q94ydR/g2dnkHapQv2XDKMRIfWgCfYalP YZD+4SZ8nkjjYPCu0Zeng/A= =c7I/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --RXc6EO4W1yUvSQ0X--