From owner-freebsd-ports  Mon Apr 16 18:30: 5 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 097C237B423
	for <freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org>; Mon, 16 Apr 2001 18:30:03 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f3H1U2f49741;
	Mon, 16 Apr 2001 18:30:03 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from gnats)
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 18:30:03 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <200104170130.f3H1U2f49741@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Cc: 
From: Mitsuru Yoshida <mitsuru@riken.go.jp>
Subject: Re: ports/26337: ports japanese/texinfo md5 changed
Reply-To: Mitsuru Yoshida <mitsuru@riken.go.jp>
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

The following reply was made to PR ports/26337; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Mitsuru Yoshida <mitsuru@riken.go.jp>
To: roam@orbitel.bg
Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ports/26337: ports japanese/texinfo md5 changed
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 10:23:20 +0900 (JST)

 roam> Could you try to find an old distfile, with the checksum as in the ports
 roam> tree, and do a 'diff' to see what changed to change the checksum?
  No difference. I guess compression method has changed.
 
 Mitsuru

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message