Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 06 Apr 1999 08:43:58 -0700
From:      Kent Stewart <kstewart@3-cities.com>
To:        Christopher Michaels <ChrisMic@clientlogic.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: TCP/IP thin Enet and Micros**T Win98
Message-ID:  <370A2BBE.35419C3@3-cities.com>
References:  <6C37EE640B78D2118D2F00A0C90FCB441A5FFB@site2s1>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


Christopher Michaels wrote:
> 
> If he's able to ping his own IP address then he has TCP/IP installed.  If
> you're only pinging IP's you don't need a hosts file.

What I have seen very often is a Win98 machine with two or so tcp/ip
drivers for the same NIC. With two drivers installed, the pc won't
communicate with anything else at that point. There is a sequence of
adapters, protocol and services and they have to be unique. The
multiple drivers can be seen in the system applet from the control
panel.

I can't imagine using a network where I connect by IP addresses, which
was the reason for the hosts file comment.

Kent

> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Kent Stewart [SMTP:kstewart@3-cities.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 1999 12:57 AM
> > To:   Walt Roberts
> > Cc:   freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
> > Subject:      Re: TCP/IP thin Enet and Micros**T Win98
> >
> > You have to install the tcp/ip protocol from start>control
> > panel>network. You can talk at this point. If you don't have dhcp,
> > create a hosts file with your ip addresses in your windows\system
> > directory.
> >
> > One thing you need to run is sfc and checkpoint your win98 files.
> >
> > Kent
> >
> > Walt Roberts wrote:
> > >
> > > I am very sorry to trouble this list with this problem, but I'm at
> > > Witt's End.  We have a single MS-Win98 system for doing things the hard
> > > way, mainly due to the software investment.  This system was running
> > > Win95 until it crashed, burned and was salvaged by installing Win98.
> > > Data is back, life is almost good.  We can't go back to 95 due to
> > > corrupt registries and other bad things.
> > >
> > > Problem:
> > > We need to talk to the FreeBSD 2.2.2 systems on the thin ethernet.
> > > Win98 took this away from us.  (We have a work around -- dial in and use
> > > sz/rz, or ppp -direct but this is hokey and it's tying up phone lines).
> > >
> > > FreeBSD box is properly configured and is assigned pvt address
> > > 192.168.1.1, no DNS or other stuff to get in the way.  Besides, its run
> > > for over 200 days without a glitch 24/7 no reboots and it talks to
> > > others (VAX/VMS -- yup we still use it).
> > >
> > > Win98 box is Via 503+/AMDk6/65 Mb mem. SMC EZcard 10 with SMC drivers
> > > (and who knows what other stuff MS shoved down its throat.)
> > >
> > > 1. If I ping the PC (192.168.1.100/mask 255.255.255.0) it talks to
> > > itself.
> > > 2.  SMC drivers and debugers say the card works and is happy.
> > > 3.  If I ping the FreeBSD box, I get request timeout.
> > > 4.  If I ping the PC from the FreeBSD box, it reports 100% packet loss.
> > > 5.  SMC doesn't supply a UNIX program to test transnetwork operations,
> > > and I don't have/don't want to make another windows box to try their
> > > stuff, besides it worked before and the appropriate lights light up on
> > > the cards at ping time.
> > >
> > > If anybody can point me in the right direction, since Microsoft's stock
> > > response is call your vendor and their response is call Microsoft, I
> > > would greatly appreciate it.
> > >
> > > Walt Roberts
> > > wroberts@med.wayne.edu
> > >
> > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
> >
> > --

-- 
Kent Stewart
Richland, WA

mailto:kstewart@3-cities.com
http://www.3-cities.com/~kstewart/index.html


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?370A2BBE.35419C3>