From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Jul 13 11:47:53 1995 Return-Path: questions-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id LAA21585 for questions-outgoing; Thu, 13 Jul 1995 11:47:53 -0700 Received: from wc.cdrom.com (wc.cdrom.com [192.216.223.37]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id LAA21579 for ; Thu, 13 Jul 1995 11:47:51 -0700 Received: from localhost.cdrom.com (localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by wc.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id LAA11098 for ; Thu, 13 Jul 1995 11:47:44 -0700 Resent-Message-Id: <199507131847.LAA11098@wc.cdrom.com> X-Authentication-Warning: wc.cdrom.com: Host localhost.cdrom.com didn't use HELO protocol Received: from who.cdrom.com (who-internal.cdrom.com [192.216.223.34]) by wc.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA11085 for ; Thu, 13 Jul 1995 11:46:47 -0700 Received: from dworshak.cs.uidaho.edu (dworshak.cs.uidaho.edu [129.101.120.160]) by who.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.11) with ESMTP id LAA10978 for ; Thu, 13 Jul 1995 11:46:45 -0700 Received: from wilson.cs.uidaho.edu (wilson.cs.uidaho.edu [129.101.120.84]) by dworshak.cs.uidaho.edu (8.6.12/1.0) with ESMTP id LAA12669 for ; Thu, 13 Jul 1995 11:46:44 -0700 From: David Hisel Received: (hisel934@localhost) by wilson.cs.uidaho.edu (8.6.10/1.0) id LAA05000 for support@cdrom.com; Thu, 13 Jul 1995 11:46:43 -0700 Message-Id: <199507131846.LAA05000@wilson.cs.uidaho.edu> Subject: FreeBSD 2.0 Jan95 CDROM To: support@cdrom.com Date: Thu, 13 Jul 1995 11:46:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 491 Resent-To: questions@freebsd.org Resent-Date: Thu, 13 Jul 1995 11:47:42 -0700 Resent-From: "Matthew L. Seidl" Sender: questions-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk Dear Sirs: I have recently installed FreeBSD 2.0 from one of your CDROMs. I have noticed only one deficiency of an otherwise superior product. FVWM for X for 2.0R is NOT in the packages directory, and when I got FVWM from the net I got all sorts of linking errors cuz I didn't have an updated version of the lib.so (3 months and already gcc is updated... oh well.) I would ask only that on future releases to include FVWM in the packages directory. Thank you. Dave Hisel