Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 7 Apr 2003 07:42:34 -0700
From:      "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG>
To:        "Matthew N. Dodd" <mdodd@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc:        cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sys/conf files src/sys/dev/stg tmc18c30.h tmc18c30_isa.c tmc18c30_pccard.c tmc18c30_pci.c tmc18c30_subr.c src/sys/modules/stg Makefile
Message-ID:  <20030407144234.GA18864@dragon.nuxi.com>
In-Reply-To: <20030407090820.H18916@sasami.jurai.net>
References:  <200304071013.h37ADPT6063960@repoman.freebsd.org> <20030407.213641.74730697.non@ever.sanda.gr.jp> <xzpbrzicw3g.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20030407.215938.41652321.non@ever.sanda.gr.jp> <20030407090354.C18916@sasami.jurai.net> <20030407130801.GB1750@elvis.mu.org> <20030407090820.H18916@sasami.jurai.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Apr 07, 2003 at 09:11:44AM -0400, Matthew N. Dodd wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Apr 2003, Maxime Henrion wrote:
> > Matthew N. Dodd wrote:
> > > On Mon, 7 Apr 2003 non@ever.sanda.gr.jp wrote:
> > > > However, all functions in tmc18c30.h is in tmc18c30_subr.c .  Is it not
> > > > confusing ?
> > >
> > > Its not confusing.
> >
> > Seconded.
> 
> Actually I should elaborate.
> 
> The naming scheme that SHOULD have been used is this:
> 
> 	tmc18c30_{isa,pci,pccard,subr}.c -> stg_{isa,pci,pccard,subr}.c
> 	tmc18c30.h -> stg.h
> 
> However, since its really not worth dealing with the repo-copy and
> repository churn we'll just cope with a suboptimal namespace.

Actually it is.  For years we'll have this code, and not having the
device name in the filename just makes it hard to find.  There isn't any
history yet, so it is trival to simply commit this again under the other
names.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030407144234.GA18864>