From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 28 14:14:24 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58A9137B404 for ; Mon, 28 Apr 2003 14:14:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.net [213.165.65.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 24CF943FBD for ; Mon, 28 Apr 2003 14:14:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from michaelnottebrock@gmx.net) Received: (qmail 750 invoked by uid 65534); 28 Apr 2003 21:14:20 -0000 Received: from pD90032F7.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO kiste.my.domain) (217.0.50.247) by mail.gmx.net (mp010-rz3) with SMTP; 28 Apr 2003 23:14:20 +0200 From: Michael Nottebrock To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 23:14:21 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.1 References: <200304281054.48976.ryba@kompakt.pl> In-Reply-To: <200304281054.48976.ryba@kompakt.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Boundary-02=_umZr+BxWq6mXRZU"; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200304282314.22236.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> Subject: Re: SWAP size X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 21:14:24 -0000 --Boundary-02=_umZr+BxWq6mXRZU Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: signed data Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 28 April 2003 10:54, Piotr Rybicki wrote: > Hi everyone. > > In man tuning(7) we read, that swap size should be about 2x main memmory > size. Why swap size should be so big? Isn't swap size equal to main memmo= ry > size enough? IMHO the swapsize=3D2x phys. mem size has always been just a rule of thumb.= You=20 need as much swap as you need (doh). But so far, the memory requirements of= =20 software have pretty much grown proportionally with the availibility /=20 affordability of bigger sticks of memory and thus the rule of thumb still=20 makes sense. YMMV. =2D-=20 Regards, Michael Nottebrock --Boundary-02=_umZr+BxWq6mXRZU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQA+rZmuXhc68WspdLARAhjFAKCmnenqs1EQgJRujtsw0buvBcuy+gCeIX3c AderGVxnKPgED8qCyVRkKRU= =xscJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_umZr+BxWq6mXRZU--