From nobody Thu Oct 17 15:17:16 2024 X-Original-To: freebsd-net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4XTrzz6ryjz5Z6ZH for ; Thu, 17 Oct 2024 15:17:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from void@f-m.fm) Received: from fout-a1-smtp.messagingengine.com (fout-a1-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.144]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4XTrzy0z8fz58BD for ; Thu, 17 Oct 2024 15:17:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from void@f-m.fm) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=f-m.fm header.s=fm2 header.b=HfxytEkt; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b=J3vpQy1+; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of void@f-m.fm designates 103.168.172.144 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=void@f-m.fm; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=f-m.fm Received: from phl-compute-12.internal (phl-compute-12.phl.internal [10.202.2.52]) by mailfout.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3455138081E for ; Thu, 17 Oct 2024 11:17:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-mailfrontend-02 ([10.202.2.163]) by phl-compute-12.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 17 Oct 2024 11:17:28 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=f-m.fm; h=cc :content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm2; t=1729178248; x=1729264648; bh=YZWpr4fYwe qxcMwpYURC4qjOegxAHZkof/S1iQsoRMc=; b=HfxytEktstVIYjtUfmxeH0hoKU 59+8nQri+tODF2dFaDblXVxri0/ZWPfXJOHG5Hts7lM9pOUD9a2nb372f5GauBXU EzfEA2z6/DNP4jDzYxZfv5ohgdrufN12wetP3BLI0LXFkrD5Akcn3lvcm4eNrsUE XzQh4VhsUPwSQuShlbYmzC0jzrULFiEcisRIw7hhCX8nv9wDrfuXudom3CZONQWi OA/tFCTSR7skTrQ2aUtHjlsXQDQf0Y0+XXw7fBUGWpL5r9FgpuTa7zeJdyVEkzQW PX82EbhjMSE0ZDDjmfTHlF3a/t8DBjHUyJQMhEyhQtT1U50gi+eXUGiKGKEA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm2; t=1729178248; x=1729264648; bh=YZWpr4fYweqxcMwpYURC4qjOegxA HZkof/S1iQsoRMc=; b=J3vpQy1+NUG88X0SsarMSUL5Kak7oQycSOG5A3oEEBOG CmA5P4750JVeKeDgwxg8IX5LnarBpgxLOD9w8VwIJxGE+UTAcFJjG2AWydR8wXqV cSTK/jz5Cpug3EKV7mrkog5rtXTPs2g7sKq8ba7vAU64fdWonkd5aQpwWp3g1pKH pdvwOuXRYOjTqm+iVKR8juN9eb3xTY82ptpY92y/RcnKOOh5XI3sQUtuknqoQ8pP ArZtEay/2T/y6FVg+b9zplzBwR1nKqtqrOmo2x/+TKuQXN17nFBZQ1+oW74MMtni L9vnc20sAHW+CUmbadZHqcjnI6LLsdEuTA69hDjvqw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeftddrvdehuddgkeekucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdggtfgfnhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggvpdfu rfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpeffhffvuf fkfhggtggujgesthdtredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvhhoihguuceovhhoihgusehfqdhm rdhfmheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepkeeluddvlefhieelfefggffhffektdehleelgf dugfdvgeekjeejuddtheehgfeunecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghm pehmrghilhhfrhhomhepvhhoihgusehfqdhmrdhfmhdpnhgspghrtghpthhtohepuddpmh houggvpehsmhhtphhouhhtpdhrtghpthhtohepfhhrvggvsghsugdqnhgvthesfhhrvggv sghsugdrohhrgh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i2541463c:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for ; Thu, 17 Oct 2024 11:17:28 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 16:17:16 +0100 From: void To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Performance issues with vnet jails + epair + bridge Message-ID: References: <20240912181618.7895d10ad5ff2ebae9883192@gmail.com> List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.56 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.96)[-0.958]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[f-m.fm,none]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[f-m.fm:s=fm2,messagingengine.com:s=fm2]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:103.168.172.128/27]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[103.168.172.144:from]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[f-m.fm]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[f-m.fm]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[f-m.fm:+,messagingengine.com:+]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:209242, ipnet:103.168.172.0/24, country:US]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[messagingengine.com:dkim] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4XTrzy0z8fz58BD X-Spamd-Bar: --- On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 11:08:27AM -0400, Cheng Cui wrote: >The patch has no effect at the host if the host is a data receiver. In this context, the vms being tested are on a bhyve host. Is the host a data sender, because the tap interfaces are bridged with bge0 on the host. Or is the host a data receiver, because data goes tapN => bge0 and then goes on to the iperf3 destination? The iperf3 destination was always a different physical machine, stable/14 --