From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 8 05:38:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C01016A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Oct 2004 05:38:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from kientzle.com (h-66-166-149-50.snvacaid.covad.net [66.166.149.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C804743D55 for ; Fri, 8 Oct 2004 05:38:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kientzle@freebsd.org) Received: from freebsd.org (p54.kientzle.com [66.166.149.54]) by kientzle.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i985cA90089055; Thu, 7 Oct 2004 22:38:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kientzle@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <416627B8.40601@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2004 22:38:00 -0700 From: Tim Kientzle User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20031006 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jose M Rodriguez References: <20041003124353.29822.qmail@web54005.mail.yahoo.com> <200410051738.32415.freebsd@redesjm.local> <4164BA94.7020009@freebsd.org> <200410071043.09015.josemi@freebsd.jazztel.es> In-Reply-To: <200410071043.09015.josemi@freebsd.jazztel.es> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.3: /stand/ versus /rescue/ ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2004 05:38:16 -0000 Jose M Rodriguez wrote: > On Thursday 07 October 2004 05:40, Tim Kientzle wrote: > >>/etc/rc.d/initdiskless should not be using either >>/stand or /rescue. > > Compressed tarball are the most standard and secure way for net boot and > are in real use. > > My 2x250 GB HD doesn't have any problem with the 2 MB stand. But it does have problems with the few dozen KB of uncompressed tarball? Tim