From owner-freebsd-security Thu Feb 4 00:32:18 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id AAA07593 for freebsd-security-outgoing; Thu, 4 Feb 1999 00:32:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from cheops.anu.edu.au (cheops.anu.edu.au [150.203.149.24]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id AAA07588 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 1999 00:32:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from avalon@cheops.anu.edu.au) Received: (from avalon@localhost) by cheops.anu.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id TAA13922; Thu, 4 Feb 1999 19:31:38 +1100 (EDT) From: Darren Reed Message-Id: <199902040831.TAA13922@cheops.anu.edu.au> Subject: Re: tcpdump To: axl@iafrica.com (Sheldon Hearn) Date: Thu, 4 Feb 1999 19:31:37 +1100 (EDT) Cc: gryphon@healer.com, security@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <26280.918076054@axl.noc.iafrica.com> from "Sheldon Hearn" at Feb 3, 99 11:07:34 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In some mail from Sheldon Hearn, sie said: [...] > What does worry me a little is the idea of making bpf's operation > dependant on the running securelevel. I thought securelevel restricted > messing around _inside_ my box. What's that got to do with what my box > can do with my wire, I wonder? Nothing. Similar to how relevant Orange Book ratings are to networked computers. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message