From owner-freebsd-current  Mon Feb 15 11:44:19 1999
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA20906
          for freebsd-current-outgoing; Mon, 15 Feb 1999 11:44:19 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from alpha.xerox.com (alpha.Xerox.COM [13.1.64.93])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id LAA20884
          for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Mon, 15 Feb 1999 11:44:17 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from fenner@parc.xerox.com)
Received: from crevenia.parc.xerox.com ([13.2.116.11]) by alpha.xerox.com with SMTP id <54582(1)>; Mon, 15 Feb 1999 11:44:09 PST
Received: from localhost by crevenia.parc.xerox.com with SMTP id <177534>; Mon, 15 Feb 1999 11:43:56 -0800
To: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>
cc: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Weird piecemeal reads over socketpair() pipe breaks up small writes into even smaller reads. 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 15 Feb 99 10:58:19 PST."
             <199902151858.KAA18526@apollo.backplane.com> 
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 1999 11:43:46 PST
From: Bill Fenner <fenner@parc.xerox.com>
Message-Id: <99Feb15.114356pst.177534@crevenia.parc.xerox.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Isn't it easier to reclassify the bug as "uipc_send() wakes up the
reader before it's done appending the data from a write() to the socket
buffer" and use my patch?  I don't think it makes sense for uipc_send()
to depend on sorwakeup() not actually waking up anyone in certain
situations.

  Bill

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message