From owner-freebsd-questions  Mon Oct  6 12:27:27 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id MAA21469
          for questions-outgoing; Mon, 6 Oct 1997 12:27:27 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions)
Received: from nemesis.idirect.com (root@nemesis.idirect.com [207.136.80.40])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA21455
          for <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 6 Oct 1997 12:27:20 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from jlixfeld@idirect.com)
Received: from thor.idirect.com (jlixfeld@thor.idirect.com [207.136.80.105])
          by nemesis.idirect.com (8.8.5/8.8.4) with SMTP
	  id PAA03380; Mon, 6 Oct 1997 15:27:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (jlixfeld@localhost) by thor.idirect.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id PAA22196; Mon, 6 Oct 1997 15:27:16 -0400
X-Authentication-Warning: thor.idirect.com: jlixfeld owned process doing -bs
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 1997 15:27:16 -0400 (EDT)
From: Jason Lixfeld <jlixfeld@idirect.com>
To: Doug White <dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu>
cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Anti-Spam from www.sendmail.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.971006121724.3848A-100000@gdi.uoregon.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.3.94.971006152552.19877M-100000@thor.idirect.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Okay, I have added the two patches (domain must resolve, and no non-local
relaying) and am noticing some crazyness..  first off, I'm trying to send
a message through pine, and am getting this error:

  [Mail not sent. Sending error: 451 hash map "spammers": unsafe map file]

Uhmm.. why?! :)

On Mon, 6 Oct 1997, Doug White wrote:

> On Mon, 6 Oct 1997, Jason Lixfeld wrote:
> 
> > Reading up on the anti-spam measures via the rulesets for sendmail.cf, I'm
> > confused as to wether or not these measures apply to servers (local hubs)
> > or relays only or do these measures apply to both?!
> 
> They apply to everyone, including local workstations.  They certainly
> should be placed on hubs and relays.  This keeps spammers from using your
> relays as their relays.
> 
> Doug White                              | University of Oregon  
> Internet:  dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu    | Residence Networking Assistant
> http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite    | Computer Science Major
> 
>