Date: Tue, 18 Feb 1997 11:12:32 +0100 From: regnauld@deepo.prosa.dk (Philippe Regnauld) To: regnauld@deepo.prosa.dk (Philippe Regnauld) Cc: pst@shockwave.com (Paul Traina), freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Popd as security weakness (Was: Re: looking for QualComm qpopper testers to try new patch) Message-ID: <Mutt.19970218111232.regnauld@deepo.prosa.dk> In-Reply-To: <Mutt.19970218105209.regnauld@deepo.prosa.dk>; from Philippe Regnauld on Feb 18, 1997 10:52:09 %2B0100 References: <199702172216.OAA28519@precipice.shockwave.com> <Mutt.19970218105209.regnauld@deepo.prosa.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Philippe Regnauld (regnauld) ecrit/writes: > > Say, I haven't looked at QPOP for some time, but if I remember > correctly, it doesn't implement an optional delay between PASS > attempts, right ? Stop. Rewind. Stop. Play. Sorry, hadn't seen #define SLEEP_SECONDS 10 in pop_pass.c :-P -- -- Phil -[ Philippe Regnauld / Systems Administrator / regnauld@prosa.dk ]- -[ Location.: +55.4N +11.3E PGP Key: finger regnauld@deepo.prosa.dk ]-
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Mutt.19970218111232.regnauld>