From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Aug 22 7:55:17 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from hal.medianet.ie (hal.medianet.ie [212.17.32.26]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ECF137B446 for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2000 07:55:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: [from teebar.traveldev.com (trabant.clubi.ie [212.17.33.226] by hal.medianet.ie (DIESPAM) with ESMTP id e7MEt8O04475; Tue, 22 Aug 2000 15:55:08 +0100] Received: from traveldev.com (dermot.traveldev.com [192.168.0.50]) by teebar.traveldev.com (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id e7MEtFV80415; Tue, 22 Aug 2000 15:55:15 +0100 (IST) Message-ID: <39A29450.FBDAEF13@traveldev.com> Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2000 15:55:12 +0100 From: Dermot McNally X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Fred Clift Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Numbering of fxp devices References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Fred Clift wrote: > in FreeBSD <= 3.X it appears that all pci-to-pci busses were probed first, > and then devices on them were probed in some fixed order. > > In FreeBSD >= 4.0 the 'newbus' code replaced a lot of the old bus code Well, this certainly isn't what got me - The oldest release that has been on this particular box is 4.0-RELEASE. At almost all times, the card has probed before the onboard, and I'm beginning to think that it will stay that way. Maybe there was a glitch introduced into the code, which got quickly backed out? Dermot To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message