From owner-freebsd-chat  Thu Sep 18 10:25:37 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-chat>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id KAA20907
          for chat-outgoing; Thu, 18 Sep 1997 10:25:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cs.uoregon.edu (vitalstatistix.cs.uoregon.edu [128.223.200.19])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA20902
          for <chat@freebsd.org>; Thu, 18 Sep 1997 10:25:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ix.cs.uoregon.edu (wcarey@ix.cs.uoregon.edu [128.223.4.21])
	by cs.uoregon.edu (8.8.7/8.8.5) with SMTP id KAA14317;
	Thu, 18 Sep 1997 10:24:27 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 1997 10:24:26 -0700 (PDT)
From: Woody Carey <wcarey@cs.uoregon.edu>
To: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com>
cc: chat@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Lab rats (was: Memory leak in getDeadbyDrivingDrunk?)
In-Reply-To: <19970918192950.58351@lemis.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.96.970918102207.28753A-100000@ix.cs.uoregon.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 18 Sep 1997, Greg Lehey wrote:

[... snip ...]

> > For the content, or the subjective subterfuge?
> 
> For the subterfuge, of course.  Here you are having interesting
> discussions under the pretext of memory leaks.
> 
What, memory leak discussions are not interesting?

Woody Carey            wcarey@cs.uoregon.edu        
	"Style is the encapsulation of subtlety."